Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:37:34 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Jeremy Chadwick <jdc@koitsu.org> Cc: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Suggesting ZFS "best practices" in FreeBSD Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1302252335520.5606@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20130225184745.GA36717@icarus.home.lan> References: <20130124174039.GA35811@icarus.home.lan> <CAFHbX1KsWa1JwvU0724owTBxV3ko5QQv4=3pKPyzeHvQBXL1qA@mail.gmail.com> <20130225184745.GA36717@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: [snip] > For systems with hot-swap bays/enclosures, most come with stickers that label > each enclosure (starting at either 0 or 1 -- intelligent vendors give you > stickers starting at 0). Sidenote: Really intelligent vendors provide you with stickers starting with 0 and ending with, say, 12 for 12-bay chassis, so you can use either numbering scheme as required by driver authors ;-) -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1302252335520.5606>