Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:16:47 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: David O'Brien <dev-null@NUXI.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: import bawk? Re: NO_AWK Message-ID: <20011026001647.A49188@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20011026010143.J93553@coffee.q9media.com>; from mike@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:01:43AM -0400 References: <200110250153.f9P1rd0H071528@atg.aciworldwide.com> <20011024211434.G15052@elvis.mu.org> <20011025135022.A80517@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011026010143.J93553@coffee.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:01:43AM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > David O'Brien <dev-null@NUXI.com> writes: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:14:34PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > Is bawk a BSD licensed version of awk? What about replacing gawk with > > > bawk? Any drawbacks? > >=20 > > bawk is license friendly for us. I've gotten all the gawk'isms out of > > our tree and have run bawk as my system awk for a while. Want me to ju= st > > do the vendor import and cut us over? >=20 > I'm in favour of this, as a -CURRENT only thang. Me too (modulo clarification of the license). One less GNU tool dependency in FreeBSD. Kris --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE72Q3eWry0BWjoQKURAgnhAKDR5pC7ogV3zmjYsa3794H0ZnKd0QCg8HEo xR/1WFbtNKe3GXOVD4nIvZA= =S2l2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011026001647.A49188>