From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 2 17:23:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6061065676; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoemix@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A33A8FC0A; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 94-21-194-68.pool.digikabel.hu ([94.21.194.68] helo=unknown) by marvin.harmless.hu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.75 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SlkLS-000Oi6-Pl; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:23:30 +0200 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 19:23:29 +0200 From: Gergely CZUCZY To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20120702192329.000074c0@unknown> In-Reply-To: <201207021055.04326.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201206112335.q5BNZGPT029709@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120629115005.00005820@unknown> <201207021055.04326.jhb@freebsd.org> Organization: Harmless Digital X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:23:32 -0000 On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 10:55:04 -0400 John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, June 29, 2012 5:50:05 am Gergely CZUCZY wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm mostly using freebsd, but there are a few cases where it's > > impossible to do, and because of these, i'm not using fbsd there. > > > > These reasons are mostly are: > > - Lack of a working infiniband/OFED stack, with all its utils, > > mellanox connectX3 drivers, RDMA, iscsi-over-RDMA, nfs-over-RDMA, > > and such things. > > FYI, OFED is present in 9.0 and later including mellanox drivers. > RDMA should be present, but I've no idea about iscsi-over-RDMA or > nfs-over-RDMA. Agreed, it's present. However, it's not in a functional state. Half of the toolkit is missing, and we couldn't get out of the system any better than icmp responses. any other means of communication failed to work. Yup, present, but not functional :)