From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 17:02:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E4816A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:02:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B514E43D49 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:02:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1109.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1B6B91C000BD for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:02:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1109.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F0FC01C000A0 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:02:21 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050224170221987.F0FC01C000A0@mwinf1109.wanadoo.fr Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:02:20 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <522548025.20050224180220@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <89b41e470502240834ba670b1@mail.gmail.com> References: <89b41e4705022407542f4feaa9@mail.gmail.com> <89b41e470502240834ba670b1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Fwd: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:02:23 -0000 Daniel writes: > would not these things be worthy of implementing in FreeBSD? this way > other big companies would use it, pay you guys for it and FreeBSD will > grow stronger... There are other obstacles to deployment of FreeBSD in large organizations. The main one is a lack of formal, guaranteed support. This afflicts Linux, also, to some extent, depending on the distribution. Even for "supported" Linux distributions, the support is often very limited in comparison to that available for systems such as Solaris, Windows, or even Mac OS X. > making a good OS that runs on cheap, low-end machines is nice, but the > real money come from companies... The problem is that the largest companies need more than just a technically superior operating system. That's why they are still buying Solaris and Windows. -- Anthony