From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 31 10:48:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA19662 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 10:48:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shasta.wstein.com (joes@shasta.wstein.com [206.163.206.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA19606; Sun, 31 May 1998 10:47:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joes@shasta.wstein.com) Received: (from joes@localhost) by shasta.wstein.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id KAA19941; Sun, 31 May 1998 10:47:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Joseph Stein Message-Id: <199805311747.KAA19941@shasta.wstein.com> Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.9 In-Reply-To: <199805281423.WAA08282@spinner.netplex.com.au> from Peter Wemm at "May 28, 98 10:23:26 pm" To: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm) Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 10:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Cc: peter@netplex.com.au, dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Wemm allegedly wrote: > Argh, I take that back, I shouldn't have uttered such crap, especially when > I had a reply in my mailbox that I had not yet seen. (And even if it > wasn't, this still wasn't appropriate). My big mouth is really going to > get me in trouble sooner or later. So what was the final verdict? Any clarifications in the works, or is everyone that wants to use 8.9.0 on their own? (no problem for me, I'm already upgraded, but just a general question.) joe -- Joseph Stein Oregon FirePage http://www.ofp.org Beaverton, Oregon (*) [OFP4/PDX] (503) 301-1575 -or- joes@pager.wstein.com joes@wstein.com * Oregon, n.: Eighty billion gallons of water with no place to go on Saturday To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message