From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 10:48:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16563106564A for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:48:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37938FC0A for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so6179965ggn.13 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:48:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KqT3AyY0HkcoO30x+A+1/Cl+jzWCzjHFJyIhwXV5/fg=; b=qRJwuSNTGW3yUL6ZlEj7BbwUgyk3Dka6MqZuWOMCTwgxxQGHzO2WqOMFAKl4nYvn1R C0zlO2g5jueu9tvvQhZXXwxLnvdzHZqr3ERO7/UqniLQCWEIcJJrhxV4Blfrx+SJgq7q XabaWpRhd/aqPHHKRuFMaxMxcDNZOX7FCuo2M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=KqT3AyY0HkcoO30x+A+1/Cl+jzWCzjHFJyIhwXV5/fg=; b=Am1JMm1pYEhp2q90HQGy8OQz/Xq/HUFOTyIdTlUyTAzurEa3zOU8ZTcJhAooCkPDUO i91lbtvVaQc6tyMCf0L7PGmEGVcrClWa9y+kQAPIEYwN0ucfFLr1x3pAMaxBDLzEH3NF /dgmPHUa4KIoGdcnDUYz8KzBlbiMYUSFaT59+dgrZB9HRYM5+aUhv6c2xfgcKAUxmwXA CpoTg2sbC5tDsn6916lfHHFyOgVLUbID4cdclb/1PDwha2FxWdCZvoAtfV83IkDCSU5W MWtgigVXuZkHyWJuEPJkI0iTB9pHwYiI+MR690f9lToSiZe4jJA3KEAlgOtiQz4+KTdS r94A== Received: by 10.236.177.1 with SMTP id c1mr5650432yhm.71.1343040533849; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i65sm24474021yhb.3.2012.07.23.03.48.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3WgfZV6T49z2CG4F for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 06:48:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 06:48:50 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120723064850.59451f74@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <1343037776471-5729143.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> <1343037776471-5729143.post@n5.nabble.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmBM152K2NvH7u1Ef0UQKcXlOkFHWjDoTPHRcmARtHmwlmFpxHkXDZGVrPN6DgQGWl2GQeq Subject: Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:48:55 -0000 On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Jakub Lach articulated: > What I previously meant is that I had such pendrive, that > without former formatting in Windows, didn't even show > up as device in FreeBSD- was completely useless. > > That does not mean I didn't newfs_msdosfsed it after > that in FreeBSD (worked perfectly fine since) :) I experienced that phenomena of a drive not being recognized once also. However, after formatting it in Windows why duplicate it again in FreeBSD? It serves no purpose that I am aware of. By the way, it is too bad that FreeBSD is not able to take advantage of the "exFat" format like other distributions do. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Paul Revere was a tattle-tale.