From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Apr 13 16:31:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (stampede.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89D114E45 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 16:31:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca14-50.ix.netcom.com [205.186.215.50]) by stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA15300; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 16:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.2/8.6.9) id QAA49347; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 16:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 16:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199904132328.QAA49347@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: silvia.hip.berkeley.edu: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: billf@chc-chimes.com Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (message from Bill Fumerola on Tue, 13 Apr 1999 15:51:51 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: ports/10375 - where to import? From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) References: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Bill Fumerola * Would it be proper to put it in benchmarks as a primary, or at least a * virtual? * * Is benchmarks only for _system_ benchmarks (I consider X an application, * if so see xengine)? I think benchmarks is fine. It's hard to justify a www proxy benchmark being in www when we already have tcpblast, netperf etc. in benchmarks (and there is a net category). -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message