From owner-freebsd-current  Wed May 21 08:10:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA15202
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 21 May 1997 08:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA15194
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 21 May 1997 08:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA26460; Wed, 21 May 1997 08:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu, current@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@polstra.com,
        rob@ideal.net.au
Subject: Re: IPDIVERT broken? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 May 1997 23:30:38 +1000."
             <199705211330.XAA26062@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 08:11:02 -0700
Message-ID: <26456.864227462@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >I think this sentence is too long, but I agree 100%.
> 
> I agree with this out of context quote.  Developers should repair the
> results of any interface changes to their code.  Changers shouldn't be
> expected to do it all.

Eh?  So you're saying that you think that it's valid practice to do a
drive-by shooting on /usr/src and then expect the developers to pick
up the pieces?

Needless to say, I would vehemently, violently disagree with such an
opinion using every constituent molecule of my body, and you'd be more
likely to get me to join the new NAZI party than back such an
ideological perspective.  Bleah.  Please tell me you meant something
different. :)

					Jordan