From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 28 16:57:23 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5DB16A4B3
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from donald.teed@gmail.com)
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.238])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF33E43CE9
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:56:59 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from donald.teed@gmail.com)
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so454186wra
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:56:56 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
	b=oUN19SsoDfWKBOLXNC+BG23hw/RAvkxSBPMxnWSOVWDAa4EDPE8ENK8lYlqOacnbqTddeaXkXNx2hNZdy3o0pAXe5BUZjB1/JCHp/T4yi2dd4LMPYxYZmfqD41yuVASC6U70DizhVy+nWERbqofEQhUxggqEqdLB2Ater8Vq/O8=
Received: by 10.78.134.12 with SMTP id h12mr1140403hud.1164733015330;
	Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.78.159.6 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <dd4da0390611280856h3177ef24yc76e4352dba65253@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:56:55 -0400
From: "D G Teed" <donald.teed@gmail.com>
To: "AT Matik" <asstec@matik.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <200611271806.50641.asstec@matik.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <dd4da0390611271156g1f0ee1f5yea9c35f65664053d@mail.gmail.com>
	<200611271806.50641.asstec@matik.com.br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how to go about diagnosing cause of packet loss
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:57:23 -0000

Hi,

OK, I think you've helped us prove that ipfw isn't the issue.
The packet loss remained with rule 01 of allow ip from any
to any.  We'll need to measure our bandwidth
processed on the box.  Thanks for the help.

--Donald Teed

On 11/27/06, AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br> wrote:
>
> On Monday 27 November 2006 16:56, D G Teed wrote:
> > We suspect something in FreeBSD or ipfw has a flaw,
> > but cannot find it.
>
> how are the results when your server has its FW open?
>
> Jo=E3o
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada
> segura.
> Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>