From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 18:20:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720FB106564A for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 18:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B348FC0C for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 18:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA6IKBcx006788 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 18:20:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pA6IKBUB006787; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 18:20:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 18:20:11 GMT Message-Id: <201111061820.pA6IKBUB006787@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kostik Belousov Cc: Subject: Re: bin/161257: procstat(1): procstat should grow a -l flag to display resource limits X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kostik Belousov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:20:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/161257; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kostik Belousov To: Mikolaj Golub Cc: John Baldwin , bug-followup@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: bin/161257: procstat(1): procstat should grow a -l flag to display resource limits Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:13:14 +0200 --7BqLQYFz2JFDkkGf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:21:29AM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote: >=20 > On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 16:08:39 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote: >=20 > KB> Please note that we grow the count of resources supported, e.g. > KB> we got RLIMIT_NPTS and RLIMIT_SWAP for 8.0. At least a comment near > KB> RLIM_NLIMITS to point anybody adding a new resource, to the kern.pro= c.rlimit > KB> handler, is useful. >=20 > Does this look ok? >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/resource.h.patch No, it completely misses my point. You should request the person to handle binary compatibility for sysctl, not for the array of names. It should be done in the course of rlimit.patch. >=20 > The update rlimit patch: >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/rlimit.1.patch I have no further comments. --7BqLQYFz2JFDkkGf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk62zjkACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jBdwCgyHAvgXGzI7syQIAJWSrVUeO9 nWgAnRr89MWz9nPw64y75GpvZdwcT/Zu =NdFL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7BqLQYFz2JFDkkGf--