Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:47:32 +0100 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Claude Buisson <clbuisson@orange.fr>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots Message-ID: <50760914.5080608@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20121010234056.GI10429@glenbarber.us> References: <50717D35.7040106@affle.com> <1349727367645-5750424.post@n5.nabble.com> <50754E24.4040903@orange.fr> <1349873186577-5750838.post@n5.nabble.com> <5075AA96.6050101@orange.fr> <20121010234056.GI10429@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/10/2012 00:40, Glen Barber wrote: > This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a > previous reply), the end goal is "official" snapshots. I think a lot of people will be wondering what's special about _your_ snapshots that they'll become official - why not just make pub.allbsd.org the official source? -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50760914.5080608>