Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 13:42:31 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: coredump@nervosa.com, uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New kernel Message-ID: <199603112042.NAA03862@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <22539.826511303@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Mar 10, 96 06:28:23 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > How about PASSIVE instead of AGRESSIVE. > > > > How about ASSERTIVE? > > > > kernel: Would it be okay if I panic'ed now? (y/n) > > How about PASSIVE_AGGRESSIVE? The kernel doesn't actually panic, but > corrupts your files occasionally when you're away on vacation. :-) It would never work. The machine would go through Lithium clock batteries like there was no tomorrow... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603112042.NAA03862>