Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:40:12 GMT From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/93705: [patch] ENODATA and EGREGIOUS (for glibc compat) Message-ID: <200602261140.k1QBeCeI065475@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/93705; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@apple.com> Subject: Re: kern/93705: [patch] ENODATA and EGREGIOUS (for glibc compat) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:35:48 +0300 On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:53:56PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: R> >Description: R> Please could you add ENODATA and EGREGIOUS errno codes for compatibility with R> Glibc systems? R> R> They have the same meaning as ENOATTR and EDOOFUS, respectively. R> R> As a side benefit, in the case of EDOOFUS this might be of interest to the Apple R> developers who complained about this macro name (i.e. they could use EGREGIOUS in R> Darwin exclussively if they want). The ENODATA error code is standardized as a part of XSI streams: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/errno.h.html I don't think we should hardcode it equal to ENOATTR, which is a BSD specific code, afaik. P.S. My opinion isn't opinion of the project. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602261140.k1QBeCeI065475>