From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 22:02:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9F01065674 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from mx.isc.org (mx.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::1c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8698FC23 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "farside.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4BBC114049 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "drugs.dv.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (not verified)) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C949E6072 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0RM2eVi019229 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:02:40 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org) Message-Id: <200901272202.n0RM2eVi019229@drugs.dv.isc.org> To: FreeBSD Stable From: Mark Andrews In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:46:22 -0800." <497BC46E.8020209@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:02:40 +1100 Sender: Mark_Andrews@isc.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mx.isc.org Cc: Subject: Looping: Re: BIND 9.4.3-P1: internal_send: 199.7.83.42#53: Device not configured, where 199.7.83.42 is RANDOM IP address X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:02:55 -0000 Can the freebsd-stable subscriber at exchange.physicalsegment.com please stop looping email. If you want to re-inject email DO NOT use the To: or Cc: lines to determine where to send the email to. It just creates email loops. Mark Received: from mail pickup service by exchange.physicalsegment.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:33:34 +0000 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([69.147.83.53]) by tsplpt01.thespinney.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.2600.5512); Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:08:47 +0000 In message <497BC46E.8020209@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes: > Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <497BBE2C.5060103@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes: > >> Mark Andrews wrote: > >>> In message <497B9FF4.30605@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes: > >>>> Any time you are using NFS you should maintain the addresses of the > >>>> critical hosts in /etc/hosts. Yes, I realize that's anachronistic > >>>> (especially for a DNS guy) but it works. Obviously you should make > >>>> sure to update them as needed. > >>> Or keep a local copy of the zone which contains them. > >> I actually considered suggesting that option, but it's unclear to me > >> whether or not named would answer at all, even for a local zone, given > >> the situation described. > > > > named will always answer for local zones. > > > > b.t.w. BIND 9 primes when it attempts to recurse for the > > first time. > > Interesting, thanks! > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org