Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:35:06 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox <kitbsdlist2@HotPOP.com> To: "Person, Roderick" <personrp@ccbh.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sorry. Message-ID: <20030917123506.7d5fedcf.kitbsdlist2@HotPOP.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA256918ACE7449BD7896E65711C88B4A7F4C@1UPMC-MSX8.isdip.upmc.edu> References: <4BA256918ACE7449BD7896E65711C88B4A7F4C@1UPMC-MSX8.isdip.upmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:56:18 -0400 "Person, Roderick" <personrp@ccbh.com> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > >From: kitsune [mailto:kitsune@gmx.co.uk] > > >> FreeBSD 4.x: ~2M lines of code (including kernel modules) > > >> MacOS X: ~6M lines of code (not including kexts) > > >> > >> >It takes a lot of work to make a usable desktop OS. > >> > >> But, isn't the majority of the additional lines dealing with the fancy > >> graphics stuff, what is it called cocoa/liguid/carbon or what ever? > > > >Yeah, but in this case that is the job of X and the toolkits and/or WMs > that > >uses X. > > So if we combine X with FreeBSD we've got a desktop OS :) Well X seems to be running quite nicely here and as a desktop, using fluxbox :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030917123506.7d5fedcf.kitbsdlist2>