From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 27 23:57:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59FA16A5FD for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 23:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5F843D46 for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 23:44:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2585290C46; Sat, 27 May 2006 20:44:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53005-04; Sat, 27 May 2006 20:44:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-7-151-244.eastlink.ca [71.7.151.244]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43185290C38; Sat, 27 May 2006 20:44:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 98CF48A873; Sat, 27 May 2006 20:44:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942FF8A679; Sat, 27 May 2006 20:44:51 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 20:44:51 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Norberto Meijome In-Reply-To: <20060524004530.37df6b39@localhost> Message-ID: <20060527204339.R1114@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060524004530.37df6b39@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diablo-jdk vs jdk1.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 23:57:56 -0000 On Wed, 24 May 2006, Norberto Meijome wrote: > Hi all, > 2 questions re. JDK 1.5 : > - is .15 considered now stable? ( I remember reading that it was still > considered alpha quality, but i cant see that notice anymore). > > - re. diablo-jdk : Other than the obvious advange of precompiled package > (already done for me, SUN certified) , is there other advantage to using > diablo-jdk instead of building my own? > And, in the same vein, any caveats I should keep in mind when using diablo-jdk > instead of jdk-1.5? My understanding is that the precompiled package performs better then the one you build from ports, *but* ... I don't know why ... On my 6-STABLE machine, to get Azureus to work properly, I had to add the following to /etc/libmap.conf: [/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/] libpthread.so libc_r.so libpthread.so.2 libc_r.so.6 else it just didn't work ... Beyond that, I've been using the precompiled one and been most happy with it ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664