Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 17:32:16 +0400 (MSD) From: "Alexander V. Tischenko" <flash@hway.ru> To: "David S. Miller" <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Eric.Schenk@dna.lth.se Subject: Re: RFCs and Urgent pointers Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.96.SK.970618173034.20551A-100000@thorin.hway.ru> In-Reply-To: <199706181313.JAA06467@jenolan.caipgeneral>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, David S. Miller wrote: > Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 16:50:13 +0400 (MSD) > From: "Alexander V. Tischenko" <flash@hway.ru> > > Anybody thought of adding the RFC style Urgent pointers to the TCP, > say, as TCP level socket option ? > > We've made this a sysctl() tunable under Linux, I don't think we > considered the benefits of making it a socket option, that may in fact > be a better approach. Comments? > I suppose it is better to make it an option, 'cause this way you can set it on per-socket basis from your applications. Alexander V. Tischenko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Integrated Network Technologies | Tel: +7 095 978-47-37 7, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125047 Russia | Fax: +7 095 978-47-37 Internet: flash@hway.ru | NIC: AT55-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.96.SK.970618173034.20551A-100000>