From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jul 19 14:00:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA12091 for current-outgoing; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 14:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gargoyle.clark.net (qmailr@gargoyle.clark.net [168.143.0.250]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA12083 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 14:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 20995 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 1997 21:07:23 -0000 Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 17:07:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Paul D. Robertson" X-Sender: proberts@gargoyle To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I am contemplating the following change... In-Reply-To: <199707191221.FAA23412@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 19 Jul 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > 2. I think that the historical IRQ value of 5 for ed0 is > more historical than valuable. :-) Given the easy availability of older network cards, and the lack of non-DOS utilities for said cards, IRQ 5 is a good thing. It's been the choice for the last 2 machines I've installed FreeBSD on at home. Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions proberts@clark.net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." PSB#9280