Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:38:59 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List replies Message-ID: <9CA3D4489328B8E911387EE0@Macintosh.local> In-Reply-To: <1206155440.6973.36.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <1206146157.6973.21.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20080322015851.GA97121@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <1206155440.6973.36.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On March 22, 2008 1:10:40 PM +1000 Da Rock <rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au> wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 02:58 +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:35:57AM +1000, Da Rock wrote: >> > This may have been suggested or discussed before, but is there a >> > reason why the reply-to on this list isn't the list itself instead of >> > the person who posted? Ie reply-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >> Because many people who ask questions here are not subscribed to the >> list and thus would not see any answers that were sent only to the list. > > Well that certainly explains it, but it does surprise me. I thought > you'd have to subscribe to post. > And *I* thought it was proper etiquette to only reply to the list. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9CA3D4489328B8E911387EE0>