Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:36:33 -0700 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk> Cc: Colin Percival <cperciva@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ed Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/cvsMakefile src/lib/libpam/libpam Makefile src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_krb5 Makefile src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ksu Makefile ... Message-ID: <6.1.0.6.1.20040806122530.03d6cb40@popserver.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <1091818349.17455.2.camel@myrddin> References: <200408060727.i767R87w004556@repoman.freebsd.org> <1091818349.17455.2.camel@myrddin>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:52 06/08/2004, Paul Richards wrote: >On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 08:27, Colin Percival wrote: >> Join the 21st century: Cryptography is no longer an optional component >> of releases. >This might not be as dead an issue as people think. From information >I've received recently it seems that exporting crypto from the UK now >requires an export license. When I asked DTI about crypto a couple years ago, their response was "it's open source? In that case, go right ahead". Of course, the usual caveats about not exporting to embargoed countries and not assisting in the production of WMD still apply, but those restrictions would apply regardless of whether we ship cryptographic binaries. Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.1.0.6.1.20040806122530.03d6cb40>