Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:27:47 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: help with 'tar|rsh tar' Message-ID: <20060624162747.GC83209@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <ef10de9a0606240900wb6684drf657de43f644c94e@mail.gmail.com> References: <ef10de9a0606231834w4e286e90u4027ff6f0835131c@mail.gmail.com> <20060624023139.GA83209@dan.emsphone.com> <ef10de9a0606232054lde0552dv38ecee1a50f2b5b9@mail.gmail.com> <ef10de9a0606240900wb6684drf657de43f644c94e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jun 24), Nikolas Britton said: > On 6/23/06, Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks!, but I got rsh going. I first had to edit /etc/hosts.equiv, > > after that I figured it out: > > > > tar cf - . | rsh 192.168.1.242 'cd /data; tar xpvf -' > > > > I was thinking tar -f as in file.tar but it's not, you have to cd > > into the source directory you want to copy... anyways... I'm > > getting around 30MB/s now... it should be in the 50-60MB/s range... > > Good enough for now though. Thanks again... > > > > hostA = P4 3GHz Prescott, Intel 82547EI GigE, FreeBSD 6.1/i386. > hostB = Athlon64 3000, Marvell Yukon Lite GigE, FreeBSD 6.1/amd64. > > Anyone know why load is so high on hostA, is it because I used tar -v? > top shows: > > CPU states: 0.0% user, 1.5% nice, 26.2% system, 61.4% interrupt, 10.9% idle That 61% interrupt looks bad, but I don't have any ideas. > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND > 18698 nbritton 1 130 20 1292K 832K RUN 171:46 28.12% rsh > 18696 nbritton 1 -4 -20 1588K 1068K getblk 48:25 6.88% bsdtar Try raising the blocksize in tar. The default is 10K. This bumps it to 64K: tar cbf 128 - . | ... -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060624162747.GC83209>