Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Dec 2020 14:06:00 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 246000] grep range bracket expression bug
Message-ID:  <bug-246000-227-nspDCe514R@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-246000-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-246000-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246000

--- Comment #6 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org ---
A commit references this bug:

Author: kevans
Date: Tue Dec  8 14:05:27 UTC 2020
New revision: 368439
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/368439

Log:
  src.opts.mk: switch to bsdgrep as /usr/bin/grep

  This has been years in the making, and we all knew it was bound to happen
  some day. Switch to the BSDL grep implementation now that it's been a
  little more thoroughly tested and theoretically supports all of the
  extensions that gnugrep in base had with our libregex(3).

  Folks shouldn't really notice much from this update; bsdgrep is slower th=
an
  gnugrep, but this is currently the price to pay for fewer bugs. Those
  dissatisfied with the speed of grep and in need of a faster implementation
  should check out what textproc/ripgrep and textproc/the_silver_searcher
  can do for them.

  I have some WIP to make bsdgrep faster, but do not consider it a blocker
  when compared to the pros of switching now (aforementioned bugs, licensin=
g).

  PR:           228798 (exp-run)
  PR:           128645, 156704, 166842, 166862, 180937, 193835, 201650
  PR:           232565, 242308, 246000, 251081, 191086, 194397
  Relnotes:     yes, please

Changes:
  head/share/mk/src.opts.mk

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246000-227-nspDCe514R>