Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 14:06:59 -0600 From: "Josh Bell" <josh@bigcity.net> To: <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Setting time and date via ntp. Message-ID: <005101bf434a$1ddfa460$41b0dece@bigcity.net> References: <199912101234.MAA12252@post.mail.areti.net><14417.6971.512702.374961@bogon.kjsl.com><19991210120334.A16989@staff.msen.com> <14417.13075.884729.244757@bogon.kjsl.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Can you not use ntpdate? I know that a stock system of FreeBSD comes with ntpdate, even as far back as 2.2.2 if not earlier. I dont see why this isnt possible to be used. What are the advantages on xntpd over ntpdate or vise versa? -Josh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Javier Henderson" <javier@KJSL.COM> To: "Michael R. Wayne" <wayne@staff.msen.com> Cc: <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 11:06 AM Subject: Re: Setting time and date via ntp. > Michael R. Wayne writes: > > > Out of curiosity, is anyone running xntpd w/ 250+ virtual domains? > > On another version of BSD we had problems with xntpd trying to open > > a channel on every virtual IP address and croaking because it was > > out of sockets. Typically we just toss a /24 onto each web server > > and we've taken to installing a custom hack of xntpd that stops > > after N interfaces regardless of what they are. > > I've xntpd running on a 2.2.8 machine with 35 virtual domains, > and I don't see the problem you're seeing. > > -jav > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005101bf434a$1ddfa460$41b0dece>