Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:52:04 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org>, "'Andrew Reilly'" <areilly@bigpond.net.au>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 127/8 continued Message-ID: <15279.36580.702035.48092@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20010924155020.O37693@buffoon.automagic.org> References: <20010924160936.A10863@gurney.reilly.home> <00e001c144c8$c33bf900$0a01a8c0@den2> <15279.36370.255717.249074@nomad.yogotech.com> <20010924155020.O37693@buffoon.automagic.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 01:48:34PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote: > > > :: Those packets are _supposed_ to get back to this host. That's > > > :: what loopback is for. > > > > > > Yes, I think the RFCs make a point of this. > > > > But if you have no interface listening on the other 254 addresses, you > > may was well blockhole them. > > s/254/16777216/ :) Duh... Right, what he said. :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15279.36580.702035.48092>