From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 12 22:02:25 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7672237B401
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 May 2003 22:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pilchuck.reedmedia.net (pilchuck.reedmedia.net [209.166.74.74])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85BF43FA3
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 May 2003 22:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from reed@reedmedia.net)
Received: from reed by pilchuck.reedmedia.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1
	(Debian))	id 19FRvV-0007bH-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 22:02:09 -0700
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 22:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net>
To: JacobRhoden <jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <200305131053.20558.jrhoden@unimelb.edu.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0305122200160.1090-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: good regular expression function for c/c++?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 05:02:25 -0000

On Tue, 13 May 2003, JacobRhoden wrote:

> > Perhaps regex(3) or ports/devel/pcre ?
>
> oops, I forgot to mentioned, preferably bsd style liscenced.. (I dont want to
> have to show people my code... it has some algorithms which become useless if
> people can easily see them).. i will probably use pcre if i can find nothing
> else.

pcre's license should be fine.  http://www.pcre.org/license.txt

   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://bsd.reedmedia.net/