Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:27:44 +0000 From: Michal Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl> To: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slashdot rejects "BSD is NOT dying" article Message-ID: <20030929002744.GB8240@pasternak.w.lub.pl> In-Reply-To: <20030928135649.T92057@fubar.adept.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030928122038.20493C-100000@fledge.watson.org> <bl79ta$cm2$1@sea.gmane.org> <200309282117.01642.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> <20030928212728.GA7348@pasternak.w.lub.pl> <20030928135649.T92057@fubar.adept.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Hoskins [Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 02:05:13PM -0700]: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Michal Pasternak wrote: > > Everyone should also check > > http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/09/01/most_reliable_and_fastest_hosting_company_sites_during_august.html [...]> > but we all know that... and the netcraft results are interesting > nonetheless. i think too many people become obsessed with uptime though. > i can load a desktop machine with just about any OS but Windows, stick it > in a colo, have it do very little, and it'll have "high uptime". what > does that mean really? Well, just make sure to click each domain and see, what do the guys behind it really do ;) I am perfectly sure, that their boxes work quite much everyday. -- Michal Pasternak :: http://pasternak.w.lub.pl Resistance isn't futile, it's voltage divided by amperage
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030929002744.GB8240>