Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:21:10 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Conrad Meyer <cse.cem@gmail.com>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> Subject: Re: unp gc vs socket close/shutdown race Message-ID: <4153235.GTBni4FTu6@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <CAG6CVpVWCxfvtnt8vQ4SiSBa=n832-gTQ7vAY8AipgQVbjueXQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAG6CVpVWCxfvtnt8vQ4SiSBa=n832-gTQ7vAY8AipgQVbjueXQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, July 12, 2015 10:51:57 AM Conrad Meyer wrote: > Hi all, > > (Sorry In-Reply-To is wrong; gmail isn't the most flexible MUA and I > was not subscribed to FreeBSD-Current until today.) > > I have a slightly cleaned up version of this patch in phabricator at > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3044 . My mentor thinks it looks ok, but > we would appreciate any feedback y'all have. The PR is here: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194264 . > > Primary changes from MJG's patch: > > * Rather than adding PR_DISPOSE2 flag, we just change dom_dispose KPI. > Unix local domain is the only in-tree consumer. I see you committed this to HEAD already and I certainly prefer fixing the KPI in HEAD. However, changing the domain KPI/KBI may not be MFC'able, so you might need to use someting closer to Matuesz's original patch when you merge. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4153235.GTBni4FTu6>