From owner-freebsd-arch  Fri Oct 25 18: 0:42 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C01737B401
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F4943E6E
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8])
          by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20021026010040.QOKU13658.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>;
          Sat, 26 Oct 2002 01:00:40 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA09071;
	Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Renumbering IPPROTO_DIVERT
In-Reply-To: <200210260047.RAA01665@windsor.research.att.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210251751080.9065-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I think the right thing is to continue to steal the number for a
transition period


On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Bill Fenner wrote:

> 
> >I think though that there should be a "compat" shim that
> >does the right thing but is VERY NOISY.
> 
> What's the right thing?
> 
> I think the right thing is to open a real raw socket.  If we are really
> feeling generous, print a message that someone used the old divert socket
> and if they meant to use the old divert socket they need to be recompiled.
> 
> (Recall that this silent failure mode is the same behavior that a
> DIVERT-using application sees if it is run on a kernel without IPDIVERT,
> so people should be used to it.)
> 
>   Bill
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message