Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:05:07 +0200 From: Laurent LEVIER <llevier@argosnet.com> To: Foxfair Hu <foxfair@FreeBSD.org>, foxfair@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/43942: New port submission: security/hydra Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20030621110231.01299fb0@belegost.cimternet.com> In-Reply-To: <200306210747.h5L7lj55021852@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, >State-Changed-Why: >Hydra is now a part of nessus, which we always have it in the ports tree. >Do we still need a separate port for this ? The nessus port is helpful but requires a heavier interface than hydra as standalone. I guess it remains better to have hydra standalone. I used it this way to challenge passwords on routers, ... and it really helps to avoid Nessus. The question is: will hydra as standalone be maintained now it is nessus included? Unfortunately, the author did not reply to me when I asked... Thanks! Brgrds Laurent LEVIER IT Systems & Networks Security Expert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.2.1.1.2.20030621110231.01299fb0>