From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jan 12 18:13:45 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA10759
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 18:13:45 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA10704;
          Mon, 12 Jan 1998 18:13:23 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jmb)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
Message-Id: <199801130213.SAA10704@hub.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Between Current and Stable...
To: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 18:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Cc: jmb@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199801130207.TAA15022@usr01.primenet.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Jan 13, 98 02:07:25 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Terry Lambert wrote:
> 
> > 	amen brother!
> > 
> > 	current is the bleeding edge.
> > 	stable is for those that dont want to or cant afford to bleed.
> > 	stable is also known as RELENG_2_2 in the cvs tree at this time.
> 
> I would like to see something between -current and -stable.
> 
> Not much.  Perhaps no more than a -current that always compiles.
> 
> Actually, I can't see how a -current that always compiles would not
> be in the best interests of all developers.
> 


	hmm....like a snapshot of current at an aspicious moment in time?

	oh, yeah, that's right, we do make SNAPSHOTS.  doh!

	;)
jmb