Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:11:16 -0500
From:      Charles Anderson <canderson@chiaro.com>
To:        FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   FW: Notification: Inbound Mail Failure 
Message-ID:  <2383E22BDFF6D311BB8400B0D021A507287E23@mail.chiaro.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_000_01C00D5F.D21E0B94
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"



-----Original Message-----
From: Administrator 
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 6:53 PM
To: Administrator
Subject: Notification: Inbound Mail Failure 


The following recipients did not receive the attached mail.  A NDR was not
sent to the originator for the following recipients for one of the following
reasons:


	* The Delivery Status Notification options did not request failure
notification, or requested no notification.

	* The message was of precedence bulk.



NDR reasons are listed with each recipient, along with the notification
requested for that recipient,
or the precedence.

<alias-chiaro-freebsd-hackers@da.chiaro.com>
alias-chiaro-freebsd-hackers@mail.chiaro.com
	MSEXCH:IMS:chiaro:da:MAIL 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient
	Precedence: bulk

The message that caused this notification was:

 
 <<Re: 4.1 Release....MIIBUS >> 

------_=_NextPart_000_01C00D5F.D21E0B94
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Message-ID: <200008232252.QAA52995@harmony.village.org>
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>
Cc: Daryl Chance <dchance@valuedata.net>, FreeBSD Hackers
	 <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: 4.1 Release....MIIBUS 
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:52:02 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

In message <200008232209.PAA35866@bubba.whistle.com> Archie Cobbs writes:
: Warner Losh writes:
: > : So why is it a separate option?
: > 
: > because it is a driver.  Why is pci a separate driver?  While most
: > computers have it, not all do.  Likewise with miibus.
: 
: Ah.. but this analogy is not exact, because (for example)
: "device ed0" does not require PCI, wheras all of these miibus
: drivers do..

"device xe" does require pccard, otherwise it fails.
"device wi" requires pccard, but will silently fail if no pccard in kernel.

: But you're probably right, since it's a driver maybe that's
: a good enough reason.

I think that it is a minor flaw in our config system.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

------_=_NextPart_000_01C00D5F.D21E0B94--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2383E22BDFF6D311BB8400B0D021A507287E23>