From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 19 20:33:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from cs.rpi.edu (mumble.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.8.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA16015038 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 20:33:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crossd@cs.rpi.edu) Received: from cs.rpi.edu (monica.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.7.2]) by cs.rpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA08749; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 23:30:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199904200330.XAA08749@cs.rpi.edu> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: crossd@cs.rpi.edu Subject: -lpthread Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 23:30:48 -0400 From: "David E. Cross" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Can we have it so that '-lpthread' accomplishes the same as '-lc_r' in terms of allowing threaded programs to link/run correctly? As was pointed out to me recently '-lc_r' for pthread support is a bit non-standard. -- David Cross | email: crossd@cs.rpi.edu Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, | Ph: 518.276.2860 Department of Computer Science | Fax: 518.276.4033 I speak only for myself. | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message