From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  3 18:54:00 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C82C106564A;
	Tue,  3 Jul 2012 18:54:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C588FC0A;
	Tue,  3 Jul 2012 18:53:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so1611690bkc.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=dwuXl3R8RNIUXt8Ei+15WhHJ1/UWhr4jcL9D95DrGns=;
	b=koTN2qAHPFsG1c6fffMHJS5oIRZq3sZrxy4zMuYWAM9oqYH015Tzm+oNPcgiNZyl1K
	U4a7yX9+ZTl0Ahe2tay09bI3NYkYpuM6DMjKQT5OAaDjsARHpBsX09VP1byYKr8rr+Rd
	JT96FxAMThfYCXs16dIK4VUyNthw3cUvrb7PqRLVf6o9/UVSEjL7Wt/Ou6h6WiFLi+SR
	nLCzUawnwMBsVGZsVDUs1jEKmrHP/hFeR6gSIYAP4npmPp7TKQvRUMNi+FrUdC8XFgv4
	lANdkFq7fAYv4LvDt3vEPHCF3DagVaSQkuYv3xIU+3seHbOV1PdDIH7pD8SmeeVTXItV
	J6MA==
Received: by 10.204.152.4 with SMTP id e4mr4684934bkw.2.1341341633273; Tue, 03
	Jul 2012 11:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: utisoft@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.49.87 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FF33B8E.1000001@yandex.ru>
References: <20120703115119.GB49312@oldfaithful.bebik.local>
	<CADLo839Pxgr21SopyhyDV5KefSvp0HM2P58BJYG5Cmsz0uGtCw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FF33B8E.1000001@yandex.ru>
From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 19:53:23 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MHAyjzkp54OfcUbs0b9aIHH9Ze8
Message-ID: <CADLo83-voqfZ0+E+n-1LdsfJjBr65ziOmqKA-ohfwzgB8Ob6_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Cc: Koop Mast <kwm@freebsd.org>, Rodrigo OSORIO <rodrigo@bebik.net>,
	freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: unbroken dev/icu in current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:54:00 -0000

On 3 July 2012 19:35, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote on 03.07.2012 22:22:
>
>> On 3 July 2012 12:51, Rodrigo OSORIO <rodrigo@bebik.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The port dev/icu fails to build in current due to an lock issue
>>> caused by the use of threads api.
>>> Disabling threads for icu in current solves the problem  and the port
>>> can be build successfully and AFAIK this unbroke some of the ports who
>>> depends on icu.
>>>
>>> I don't know if this can be an acceptable short-term workaround for this
>>> por ?
>>
>>
>> I've been reliably informed that icu builds just fine on CURRENT from
>> 1/July.  I'll update my Tinderbox and let you know.
>>
>> Chris
>
>
> Can confirm that it builds without an issue on r237936 (Sun Jul  1 19:07:45
> 2012) with default option set (threads enabled).
>

Great.... now I need to find an appropriate OSVERSION for marking
BROKEN on; I'm tempted to start with 1000000 and end with 1000014; if
no-one yells at me I'll commit it in an hour or so.

Chris