Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 19:53:23 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: Koop Mast <kwm@freebsd.org>, Rodrigo OSORIO <rodrigo@bebik.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unbroken dev/icu in current Message-ID: <CADLo83-voqfZ0%2BE%2Bn-1LdsfJjBr65ziOmqKA-ohfwzgB8Ob6_g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FF33B8E.1000001@yandex.ru> References: <20120703115119.GB49312@oldfaithful.bebik.local> <CADLo839Pxgr21SopyhyDV5KefSvp0HM2P58BJYG5Cmsz0uGtCw@mail.gmail.com> <4FF33B8E.1000001@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 July 2012 19:35, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> wrote: > Chris Rees wrote on 03.07.2012 22:22: > >> On 3 July 2012 12:51, Rodrigo OSORIO <rodrigo@bebik.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The port dev/icu fails to build in current due to an lock issue >>> caused by the use of threads api. >>> Disabling threads for icu in current solves the problem and the port >>> can be build successfully and AFAIK this unbroke some of the ports who >>> depends on icu. >>> >>> I don't know if this can be an acceptable short-term workaround for this >>> por ? >> >> >> I've been reliably informed that icu builds just fine on CURRENT from >> 1/July. I'll update my Tinderbox and let you know. >> >> Chris > > > Can confirm that it builds without an issue on r237936 (Sun Jul 1 19:07:45 > 2012) with default option set (threads enabled). > Great.... now I need to find an appropriate OSVERSION for marking BROKEN on; I'm tempted to start with 1000000 and end with 1000014; if no-one yells at me I'll commit it in an hour or so. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-voqfZ0%2BE%2Bn-1LdsfJjBr65ziOmqKA-ohfwzgB8Ob6_g>