From owner-freebsd-security Tue Dec 14 20: 5:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (alecto.physics.uiuc.edu [130.126.8.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D2C14F9E for ; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:05:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu) Received: (from igor@localhost) by alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) id WAA28271; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 22:04:57 -0600 (CST) From: Igor Roshchin Message-Id: <199912150404.WAA28271@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: CERT released RSAREF bulletin In-Reply-To: <199912142340.QAA56342@harmony.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at "Dec 14, 1999 4:40:53 pm" To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 22:04:57 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > In message <4.2.2.19991214112940.01c3d5b8@mail.myable.com> Marc > Bejarano writes: > : i guess the rsaref port needs updating? > > Satoshi-san has updated the port. > > Warner > > I've noticed that the patch just changed from its Dec.2 version. Does it mean that the rsaref2 (and therefore the software based on it) as of Dec.2-Dec.13 is/was still vulnerable, or this is more of a aesthetic change for the sake of the patch elegancy ? Thanks, Igor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message