From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 20 09:01:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB25B43EFF for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu [46.165.253.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4511455 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A4B6661FD7; Fri, 20 May 2016 11:01:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 11:01:18 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tinc and IPv6 routing, or: how to set up a local IPv6 Message-ID: <20160520090118.GA26491@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <04e2cb6c-f8c3-7d30-dd53-ca18870c4598@seacom.mu> <20160520065857.GA59066@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <545832b8-d7df-9858-82c4-dfe9cc4c7023@seacom.mu> <20160520072052.GB59066@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <259f3563-b943-b75f-5d4b-92d3d39aa0ca@seacom.mu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <259f3563-b943-b75f-5d4b-92d3d39aa0ca@seacom.mu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:01:28 -0000 Mark Tinka [2016-05-20 10:18 +0200] : > Well, that is what ULA's are for, but to be honest, I use GUA's for both > my public and private networks. > > I know ULA's mimics RFC 1918, but I don't believe in NAT66, so I've > never tried ULA's. OK, thanks for the advice. I haven't grasped how IPv6 works completely yet. So, NAT66 is for prefix rewriting, right? Where would I need that? Simple routing (as I tried to achieve) doesn't work here? > I think your issue might somewhat be influenced by the use of ULA's. I just stumbled over https://wiki.freebsd.org/IPv6TODO. Would you recommend to wait with what I am trying to achieve? I mean, the VPN works for IPv4, so I can let the servers communicate via v4 and not v6. Does that have any disadvantages? I mean, shouldn't we all get IPv6-ready? Thanks for sharing your experience. Niklaas