From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 6 16:30:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F5416A4CF for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 16:30:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567FE43FBF for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 16:30:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 2C722530C; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:30:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 1EDA05308; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:30:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id A65CE33C6A; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 01:30:39 +0100 (CET) To: Michael Smith References: <1070640554.22666.14.camel@bigboot.humphrey.world> <20031205103549.Y27123@root.org> <372147CC-2759-11D8-9E07-000393C72BD6@mac.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:30:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <372147CC-2759-11D8-9E07-000393C72BD6@mac.com> (Michael Smith's message of "Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:28:33 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A word of support for Nate Lawson... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 00:30:49 -0000 Michael Smith writes: > However, it's on the where-does-this-affect-FreeBSD front that ACPI > is really significant. Without working ACPI support, FreeBSD will not > run properly on a wide range of modern hardware. I think this can bear stating even more bluntly: without working ACPI support, in two or three years you won't be able to walk into a store and buy hardware that FreeBSD will run on. In fact, I believe that's already the case for laptops. Thanks, Nate! DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no