From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 21 19:09:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E5E3FBB; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E053D1EB8; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0LJ97vh097051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:09:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:09:07 -0600 From: dweimer To: Odhiambo Washington Subject: Re: Re[2]: 9.2 -> 10.0 Compille error. Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: <1390318454.138054037.136hfeiu@frv34.ukr.net> <1390321475.740479345.wsfoy2po@frv34.ukr.net> Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0-beta Cc: questions , owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, wishmaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:09:10 -0000 On 01/21/2014 12:33 pm, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > A good guy going by the names of Ralf S. Engelschall used o document > major > upgrade procedures here ->http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/upgrade/ and I > remember I tested his procedure for upgrade from 8.x -> 9.x and it > worked!! > He was most responsive and helpful. However, such procedure seems > untenable > for 9.x -> 10.x ... there are so many changes in 10.0 that it would > just > make sense to install 10.0 and migrate your data instead of upgrading > from > 9.x. However, this is a rope you've chosen for yourself. Go right ahead > and > commit the digital suicide:) > > > On 21 January 2014 19:33, wishmaster wrote: > >> >> > >> > Does this mean you are UPDATING from 9.2 to 10.0-RELEASE?? >> >> Yes. It does. If be more exactly from 9.2-STABLE to 10-STABLE >> >> > Hmm, better just do a fresh install. There may be ways out though, but >> I'd not try it with the changes I saw in 10.0!! >> >> It is unable. I have just droped src.conf and make.conf to defaults >> .or >> the time being without errors. >> Below src.conf. May be anybody can point me to my mistake. I think >> there >> is some dependencies which I've broken: >> >> WITHOUT_ATM=true >> WITHOUT_AMD=true >> WITHOUT_APM=true >> WITHOUT_AUDIT=true >> WITHOUT_BLUETOOTH=true >> WITHOUT_BSNMP=true >> WITHOUT_CALENDAR=true >> WITHOUT_CDDL=true >> WITHOUT_CTM=true >> WITHOUT_CROSS_COMPILER=true >> WITHOUT_DICT=true >> WITHOUT_FLOPPY=true >> WITHOUT_FREEBSD_UPDATE=true >> WITHOUT_GAMES=true >> WITHOUT_GDB=true >> WITHOUT_GCOV=true >> WITHOUT_HTML=true >> WITHOUT_INET6=true >> WITHOUT_IPFILTER=true >> WITHOUT_PF=true >> #WITHOUT_IPFW=true >> #WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB=true >> WITHOUT_IPX=true >> #WITHOUT_JAIL=true >> WITHOUT_LEGACY_CONSOLE=true >> WITHOUT_LPR=true >> WITHOUT_NDIS=true >> #WITHOUT_NIS=true >> WITHOUT_NCP=true >> WITHOUT_NTP=true >> WITHOUT_PROFILE=true >> WITHOUT_RCMDS=true >> WITHOUT_ROUTED=true >> WITHOUT_RESCUE=true >> #WITHOUT_QUOTAS=true >> WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=true >> WITHOUT_SHAREDOCS=true >> WITH_SVN=true >> WITHOUT_TCSH=true >> WITHOUT_USB=true >> WITHOUT_WIRELESS=true >> WITHOUT_WPA_SUPPLICANT_EAPOL=true >> WITHOUT_ZFS=true >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On 21 January 2014 18:35, wishmaster wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> anybody has had this error? >> >> cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -fpic -fvisibility=hidden >> -DVISIBILITY_HIDDEN -std=gnu99 -Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector >> -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized >> -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-empty-body -Wno-string-plus-int >> -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality >> -Wno-unused-function -Wno-enum-conversion -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum >> -Wno-knr-promoted-parameter -c >> /usr/src/lib/libcompiler_rt/../../contrib/compiler-rt/lib/absvdi2.c -o >> absvdi2.o >> cc: unrecognized option '-Qunused-arguments' >> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-empty-body" >> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-string-plus-int" >> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option >> "-Wno-tautological-compare" >> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option >> "-Wno-parentheses-equality" >> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-enum-conversion" >> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option >> "-Wno-knr-promoted-parameter" >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop. >> bmake[3]: stopped in /usr/src/lib/libcompiler_rt >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop. >> bmake[2]: stopped in /usr/src >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop. >> bmake[1]: stopped in /usr/src >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop. >> bmake: stopped in /usr/src >> *** [buildworld] Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/src. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, >> > Nairobi,KE >> > +254733744121/+254722743223 >> > "I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler." >> > >> I have not had any problems getting the build world or kernel to work, under 9.2, so you might want to check on the options you have set in /etc/make.conf and /etc/src.conf and see if one of them is causing your build issue. I have not however, successfully been able to get my ports to reinstall after doing an update though, but I haven't given up trying on test systems yet. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/