From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 20:46:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EA71DFADC for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:46:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.shmhost.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d7::103:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p39T4wx4z4LYM for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.fritz.box (ip9234d229.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [146.52.210.41]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47p39K5TY0zKkf3; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:46:13 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Re: Portmaster failing From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:46:13 +0100 Cc: FreeBSD Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> To: "@lbutlr" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.4 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p39T4wx4z4LYM X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of franco@lastsummer.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a01:4f8:a0:51d7::103:2) smtp.mailfrom=franco@lastsummer.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.56 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[41.210.52.146.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.97)[ip: (-0.85), ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-2.43), asn: 24940(-1.54), country: DE(-0.02)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lastsummer.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 20:46:22 -0000 > On 1. Jan 2020, at 9:42 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >=20 > On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner = wrote: >> security/openssl was removed before, now security/openssl111 has = become security/openssl. >=20 > Ugh. >=20 >> A bit too eager for my taste, but that's why we all have private = trees, don't we. ;) >=20 > This is going to go poorly, if previous attempts to update to 1.1 are = any indication. With PHP 5.6 axed prematurely a while back I am interested to see = OpenSSL 1.0.2 phased out now with a number of ports still not supporting 1.1.1 and = seeing them marked as broken sooner or later. With all this in mind, I'm surprised Python did not suffer the same fate and was deprecate-extended to the end of 2020 in the ports tree which is = an unusual 180 regarding previous arguments that having expired ports still supported is "too much work". Happy new year, Franco