From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 19 00:17:19 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6820106566C
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:17:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
	[128.208.78.105])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8A58FC0A
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:17:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu
	[127.0.0.1])
	by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id
	m3J0FtR6050153; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
	by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id
	m3J0Ftuj050152; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sgk)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:15:55 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
Message-ID: <20080419001555.GA50009@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <20080418132749.GB4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
	<200804181945.59189.max@love2party.net>
	<20080418204738.GE4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080418204738.GE4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Integration of ProPolice in FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:17:19 -0000

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:47:38PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> 
> Certainly.  I would like to hear opinion from other committers if SSP
> should be enabled by default.
> 

I'm not a committer, but I'll ask a question anyway.

Can you quantify the performance impact, in particular for
numerically intensive codes with heavy use of libm?

-- 
Steve