From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 23 20:36:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D611065672 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296828FC19 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by QMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 7QDZ1c0040mv7h05AYcBeF; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:36:11 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by OMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 7Yc91c00Q1f6R9u3XYcAbd; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:36:11 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:36:08 -0700 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:36:08 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <200906181114.43935.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <3f6a88120906230713kf44c826x928beea65adf6c0e@mail.gmail.com> <20090623175247.GA65395@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <200906231506.05001.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200906231506.05001.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:36:11 -0000 On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > >Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category >becomes a catch all for both entities. If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"?