Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:49:13 -0800 From: Devin Teske <devin.teske@fisglobal.com> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: devin.teske@fisglobal.com, "Robison, Dave" <Dave.Robison@fisglobal.com> Subject: ZFS Question Message-ID: <010501ce0f04$1bdae820$5390b860$@fisglobal.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, What's the difference between: zpool create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME disk_device and zpool create -m none POOL_NAME disk_device zfs create -m /desired_destination POOL_NAME/foo We would prefer the former, but see more uses of the latter. The whole point is that we want to "keep things simple" and having only a single mount-point makes things simpler, but I'm curious about any possible fallbacks to using just the pool on the mount point with zero filesystems created underneath. In other words... does "zfs create" actually buy us anything versus just using the pool mounted on the desired location? -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?010501ce0f04$1bdae820$5390b860$>