Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:31:41 -0500
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes
Message-ID:  <5491E82D.8090105@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <5491E775.5010403@gmail.com>
References:  <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> <5491E61B.9070505@bluerosetech.com> <5491E775.5010403@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/17/2014 3:28 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>> Does the zpool clear command make it go away?


Nope, tried that :(

# zpool clear tank1 ada11
# zpool status
   pool: tank1
  state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block size.
         Expect reduced performance.
action: Replace affected devices with devices that support the
         configured block size, or migrate data to a properly configured
         pool.
   scan: resilvered 898G in 8h4m with 0 errors on Wed Dec 17 15:01:18 2014
config:

         NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
         tank1       ONLINE       0     0     0
           raidz1-0  ONLINE       0     0     0
             ada12   ONLINE       0     0     0
             ada10   ONLINE       0     0     0
             ada6    ONLINE       0     0     0
             ada14   ONLINE       0     0     0
           raidz1-1  ONLINE       0     0     0
             ada11   ONLINE       0     0     0  block size: 512B 
configured, 4096B native


-- 
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5491E82D.8090105>