Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:08:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/scons Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.1.99.0907131906500.8877@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <20090713143026.GA36954@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200907072353.n67NrlPh032677@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090713143026.GA36954@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> - Update to checkpoint release 1.2.0_20090223 > This change is wrong; PORTREVISION should not be used to encode any > software version part; its sole purpose for ports infrastructure only. > For complex vendor versions, DISTVERSION should be used instead. Right > now, for instance, you've essentially made impossible to bump PORTREVISION, > shall it be required for any reason, without introducing ugly hacks. This sounds very familiar to the status quo I maintained with the lang/gcc ports for some years which I then resolved a few months ago. Philip, you may want to have a look at lang/gcc43 for an example how I addressed this there -- and if you find improvements, let me know. ;-) Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LSU.1.99.0907131906500.8877>