Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 14:20:06 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246527] emulators/qemu-user-static: please add syscall 574 (__realpathat) Message-ID: <bug-246527-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246527 Bug ID: 246527 Summary: emulators/qemu-user-static: please add syscall 574 (__realpathat) Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: emulation@FreeBSD.org Reporter: d8zNeCFG@aon.at Assignee: emulation@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(emulation@FreeBSD.org) Scenario: - using qemu-user-static to cross compile ports in FreeBSD 13 armv6 - The native boot shows (in dmesg.boot) FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #0 r361029M: Fri May 15 16:26:48 CEST 2020 root@v903.xyzzy:/auto/z/OBJ/FreeBSD/amd64/head/arm.armv6/sys/RPI-B arm FreeBSD clang version 10.0.0 (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg-10.0.0-0-gd32170dbd5b) - But here, qemu-user-static is used instead, chrooting to the armv6 installation. - The amd64 host is also at r361029. Result: - There are many lines of qemu: unsupported syscall: 574 (calling anyway) qemu: unsupported syscall: 574 (calling anyway)=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 qemu: unsupported syscall: 574 (calling anyway) qemu: unsupported syscall: 574 (calling anyway) - These lines sometimes even confuse tools, causing the build to fail. Could you please add the latest syscalls to this port? -- Martin --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246527-7788>