Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:25:21 +0200
From:      Roman Neuhauser <dev-null@bellavista.cz>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Dead natd -> dead system
Message-ID:  <20030711172521.GC35136@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
In-Reply-To: <200307101957.NAA01395@lariat.org>
References:  <200307101957.NAA01395@lariat.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# brett@lariat.org / 2003-07-10 13:57:33 -0600:
> While working with a FreeBSD system this afternoon, I did something which killed
> natd (the NAT daemon), which was processing packets in the usual way via ipfw
> and a divert socket.
> 
> The result? Network communications on the system simply went dead.
> 
> It seems to me that ipfw should be able to "self-heal" (that is, bypass the
> rule) or reinvoke a daemon that's attached to a divert socket. Otherwise,
> the process that's attached to the socket becomes an Achilles' heel for
> the whole system. Crash it for any reason, and the system's offline.
> 
> Ideas?

    sysutils/daemontools ?

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030711172521.GC35136>