From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 24 11:29:00 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id LAA03065 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 24 Jul 1995 11:29:00 -0700 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA03058 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 1995 11:28:58 -0700 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA07597; Mon, 24 Jul 95 12:21:20 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9507241821.AA07597@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: dial up at > 9600 baud To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 95 12:21:19 MDT Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, ache@astral.msk.su, hackers@freebsd.org, harry@hgac.com, jkh@violet.berkeley.edu In-Reply-To: <199507232359.JAA26520@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jul 24, 95 09:59:35 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > >Maybe his modem is sending crap before raising DCD, and it's getting > >echoed before a read is issued by getty? This would be a driver > >bug. > > The driver is careful not to enable ECHO by default (it mostly ignores > the stupid defaults in . getty could cause the > problem by setting ECHO before setting the speed. I don't think it > does, although it takes 2 ioctls to set things. I was thinking in terms of FIFO queue depth, with characters in the FIFO but the FIFO not yet to the trigger level. Perhaps the FIFO should not be enabled when DTR is not present? Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.