From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 13:02:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4FD16A400 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from mx1.netclusive.de (mx1.netclusive.de [89.110.132.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9252813C428 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Fdd20.f.ppp-pool.de [195.4.221.32]) by mx1.netclusive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F396FDE803F for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:02:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 7BFAB15213; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:02:15 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:02:15 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <539c60b90703010849x33dd4bbbt8f6ca6aa0c8e83a0@mail.gmail.com> <45E7070E.9050506@daleco.biz> <45E70B8C.8010602@daleco.biz> <539c60b90703011250y7ad5b475v936b4d357549d50e@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: garfield.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1172926935 99267 192.168.100.11 (3 Mar 2007 13:02:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:02:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: defrag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:02:18 -0000 On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:50:44 -0700 Steve Franks wrote: > Excellent! Never had that one answered. I've gone down the typical > road of being an MS booster ("It doesn't take 10 hours to set up and > configure") to experiencing glee when I find yet another way FBSD > kicks the crap out of MS. Why? Because I've grown up, and learned > that 2 hours time spent *reading* and configuring is way better than 2 > days time spent when the system crashes in the middle of the workweek > - bottom line, BSD is cheaper before, during, and after installation. > Probably by a factor of 10 for me over the last 10 years. As I write > this, I'm on a MS laptop that has degraded to the point where any disk > acess takes 10 seconds before the display updates (but not from the > shell - so not a defrag issue, just a screwed registry or something). > I used to reinstall my entire MS server every 6 months, on average... Hence the three Rs of MS support. Regards Chris