From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 18 13:30:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9307E37B416 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-97.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABB2440F5 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:59:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5BA66D6A; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6DF42A4E; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:59:30 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sergey Matveychuk Message-ID: <20030818195930.GB73409@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <3F4037B9.1010604@ciam.ru> <20030818051533.GA70270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3F40CC65.1000204@ciam.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y7xTucakfITjPcLV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F40CC65.1000204@ciam.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Apache dependence X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:30:22 -0000 --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:53:57PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 06:19:37AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > > >>How people decide the problem with ports depended on Apache? > >>It is known there is a few apache ports, how to decide what port to=20 > >>depend on? > > > > > >See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/32604 > >The patch needs to be updated to use APACHE_PORT instead. >=20 > But how is it works? Where APACHE_PORT is set? There is no such variable= =20 > in Mk/bsd.*.mk. > I've seen no patch where you point. The PR proposes to use AP_PORT to hold the category/portname of the default apache port to use. As discussed in the audit trail of the PR, the variable should be named APACHE_PORT instead. Kris --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/QTAiWry0BWjoQKURAsv+AKD8JjNdLcRh9UktqnfzEEIK39mNUACgtBMZ sw/2YcivUNkZV5weuJPYMy0= =kf0V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV--