From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 23 21:09:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71127106566C for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFDC8FC08 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21776 invoked by uid 399); 23 Feb 2010 21:09:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 23 Feb 2010 21:09:54 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4B844421.1020302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:09:53 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100218 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov References: <20100214124647.686e22e2@smtp.mail.yahoo.co.uk> <4B786AF1.2090803@FreeBSD.org> <4B78717C.9070901@yandex.ru> <4B78721D.7030209@FreeBSD.org> <4B838F6B.3000306@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4B838F6B.3000306@yandex.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:09:55 -0000 On 02/23/10 00:18, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled: >> >> That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the >> update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs. >> >> >> Doug >> > > So is there any news about this? > The port is now marked as broken in ports tree. I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/